premium Tier Analysis

QYLD vs XYLD: The Nasdaq/S&P Income Showdown

Head-to-head comparison of the two most popular covered call ETFs.

DivAgent Research Team
2026-01-08
5 min read

Key Takeaways

  • QYLD (Nasdaq-100): Higher yield (~12%), more volatile, tech-heavy, greater NAV erosion risk.
  • XYLD (S&P 500): Lower yield (~10%), more diversified, historically better NAV preservation.
  • Tax Treatment: Both generate ordinary income distributions - not qualified dividends.
  • Our Pick: XYLD for core income allocation; QYLD as a satellite for yield boost.

Head-to-Head Comparison

MetricQYLDXYLD
Underlying IndexNasdaq-100S&P 500
Current Yield~11-13%~9-11%
Expense Ratio0.60%0.60%
AUM~$8B~$3B
Launch Date20132013
StrategyAt-the-money callsAt-the-money calls
DivAgent Risk TierTier 4Tier 4

How They Work: The Covered Call Strategy

Both QYLD and XYLD use a buy-write strategy, which means they:

  1. Hold the underlying index stocks (Nasdaq-100 or S&P 500)
  2. Sell monthly at-the-money call options on the entire portfolio
  3. Collect option premiums and distribute them as monthly income

The premium collected from selling calls is the source of the high yield. However, this strategy caps upside potential - if the market rallies significantly, these ETFs will underperform their underlying index.

The NAV Erosion Problem

Critical Warning

Both QYLD and XYLD have experienced significant NAV erosion since inception. A high distribution yield does NOT mean high total returns.

Since 2013, QYLD's NAV has declined approximately 30-40% from its initial price. XYLD has fared slightly better but still shows meaningful erosion.

Why does this happen? In strong bull markets, the covered call strategy gives away upside gains. The ETF collects premium, but misses the rally. Over time, the gap between "what the index did" and "what the ETF captured" compounds.

QYLD: The Case For and Against

Pros

  • Higher yield: Tech volatility means fatter option premiums
  • Monthly income: Consistent distributions for cash flow
  • Large AUM: High liquidity, tight spreads

Cons

  • Concentrated sector risk: Tech-heavy (Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA)
  • Greater NAV erosion: Higher volatility leads to more upside capture loss
  • Tax inefficient: 100% ordinary income distributions

XYLD: The Case For and Against

Pros

  • Diversification: S&P 500 spans all sectors
  • More stable: Lower volatility than Nasdaq
  • Better NAV preservation: Historically less erosion than QYLD

Cons

  • Lower yield: Less volatile underlying = smaller premiums
  • Still has erosion: Not immune to NAV decline
  • Same tax treatment: Ordinary income, no special advantages

When to Choose QYLD

Choose QYLD if you:

  • Need maximum current income
  • Are in a tax-advantaged account (IRA, Roth)
  • Believe tech will stay volatile but range-bound
  • Use it as a satellite position (5-15% of portfolio)

When to Choose XYLD

Choose XYLD if you:

  • Want more diversified income exposure
  • Prefer slightly lower risk over maximum yield
  • Are building a core income allocation
  • Want exposure to all 11 S&P sectors

The DivAgent Verdict

For most income investors, we recommend XYLD over QYLD for core allocations.

The additional yield from QYLD does not compensate for its concentration risk and greater NAV erosion. However, both ETFs should be considered Tier 4 (Volatility Harvest) positions - meaning they belong in the "accelerator" portion of your portfolio, not the foundation.

If you want covered call exposure, consider:

  • JEPI/JEPQ: Lower erosion, defensive stock selection
  • XYLD: Broad market covered calls
  • QYLD: Tech-focused yield boost (satellite only)
Calculate Your Real Return

Use our NAV Erosion Calculator to see the true total return of QYLD or XYLD over different time periods. High yield means nothing if NAV is declining.

Open NAV Calculator →

Read the full story.

This deep dive is exclusive to Premium members. Join today to unlock this analysis and our full research library.

Unlock Access for $12/mo

Or start a 7-day free trial

Trusted by 10,000+ Investors