Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.
What this means: Both GPIX and NLSI fall intoTier 4: Harvest. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.
| Metric | GPIX | NLSI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NAV Change (1Y) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Max Drawdown | 0.00% | -7.37% |
| Beta | - | - |
* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.
GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income) is a options-based income fund managed by Goldman Sachs. It focuses on generating income through strategic holdings. With $2.7B in assets under management, this fund has been operational since its inception.
Strategy: Generates enhanced income through covered call options on equity holdings, trading upside potential for premium income.
NLSI (NEOS Long/Short Income) is a options-based income fund managed by NEOS. It focuses on generating income through strategic holdings. With $5.6M in assets under management, this fund has been operational since its inception.
Strategy: Generates enhanced income through covered call options on equity holdings, trading upside potential for premium income.
In the head-to-head battle of GPIX vs NLSI, the choice depends on your specific goal. NLSI wins for Immediate Income with a 1.95% yield. However, NLSI is the better choice for Long-Term Growth due to superior total return performance.
Which fund is safer for retirement income? We analyze the yield sustainability and structural risk.
The Bottom Line Question: If you invest $100,000 today, how much cash will you actually receive each month? Here's the exact math:
GPIX
Annual Yield: 0.00%
$0/mo
($0/year)
Frequency: monthly
NLSI
Annual Yield: 1.95%
$162/mo
($1,946/year)
Frequency: quarterly
Income Gap: NLSI generates $1,946/year more than GPIX on the same $100k investment.
Over 20 years, that's $38,918 in additional cash flow (before reinvestment).
Context Matters: Higher income doesn't always mean better investment. Review the "Yield Trap" and "Total Return" sections above—you want income that's sustainable, not just headline-grabbing.
Historical data reveals how these funds behave during market stress. NLSI has delivered a superior Total Return of 0.00% over the past year.
What is an Expense Ratio? The annual fee charged by the fund, expressed as a percentage of assets. It's deducted daily from the fund's NAV, making it invisible to most investors—but it compounds over time.
GPIX (LOWER COST)
0.290%
Annual expense ratio
NLSI (HIGHER COST)
2.890%
Annual expense ratio
20-YEAR FEE IMPACT SIMULATION ($100,000 INITIAL INVESTMENT)
The Hidden Cost of "Just 2.60%": That seemingly small difference of 2.600% annually becomes $52,000 in lost wealth over 20 years. Factor in compound growth, and you're giving up ~$119,106 in potential portfolio value.
💡 Cost Efficiency Winner: GPIX is the clear winner for long-term buy-and-hold investors. Lower fees mean more capital compounds in YOUR account, not the fund manager's.
Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.