Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.
What this means: Both IAUI and NLSI fall intoTier 4: Harvest. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.
| Metric | IAUI | NLSI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NAV Change (1Y) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.13% | -7.37% |
| Beta | - | - |
* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.
IAUI (NEOS Gold Income) is a options-based income fund managed by NEOS. It focuses on generating income through strategic holdings. With $276.4M in assets under management, this fund has been operational since its inception.
Strategy: Generates enhanced income through covered call options on equity holdings, trading upside potential for premium income.
NLSI (NEOS Long/Short Income) is a options-based income fund managed by NEOS. It focuses on generating income through strategic holdings. With $5.6M in assets under management, this fund has been operational since its inception.
Strategy: Generates enhanced income through covered call options on equity holdings, trading upside potential for premium income.
In the head-to-head battle of IAUI vs NLSI, the choice depends on your specific goal. IAUI wins for Immediate Income with a 12.02% yield. However, NLSI is the better choice for Long-Term Growth due to superior total return performance.
Which fund is safer for retirement income? We analyze the yield sustainability and structural risk.
The Bottom Line Question: If you invest $100,000 today, how much cash will you actually receive each month? Here's the exact math:
IAUI
Annual Yield: 12.02%
$1,002/mo
($12,018/year)
Frequency: monthly
NLSI
Annual Yield: 1.95%
$162/mo
($1,946/year)
Frequency: quarterly
Income Gap: IAUI generates $10,072/year more than NLSI on the same $100k investment.
Over 20 years, that's $201,444 in additional cash flow (before reinvestment).
Context Matters: Higher income doesn't always mean better investment. Review the "Yield Trap" and "Total Return" sections above—you want income that's sustainable, not just headline-grabbing.
Historical data reveals how these funds behave during market stress. NLSI has delivered a superior Total Return of 0.00% over the past year.
What is Max Drawdown? Max drawdown measures the largest peak-to-trough decline in portfolio value during a specific period. Unlike NAV change (which only looks at start vs. end), max drawdown captures the worst moment of pain an investor experienced.
Real-World Scenario: $100,000 Investment
NLSI (More Resilient)
Max Drawdown: -7.37%
-$7,370
Worst unrealized loss
IAUI (More Volatile)
Max Drawdown: -23.13%
-$23,130
Worst unrealized loss
Protection Value: NLSI saved investors $15,760 in drawdown severity on a $100k position.
Why This Matters More Than Total Return: During bear markets or corrections, investors with lower max drawdown are:
⚖️ Capital Preservation Winner: NLSI demonstrated superior downside protection, making it the better choice for retirees who cannot afford steep temporary losses.
What is an Expense Ratio? The annual fee charged by the fund, expressed as a percentage of assets. It's deducted daily from the fund's NAV, making it invisible to most investors—but it compounds over time.
IAUI (LOWER COST)
0.780%
Annual expense ratio
NLSI (HIGHER COST)
2.890%
Annual expense ratio
20-YEAR FEE IMPACT SIMULATION ($100,000 INITIAL INVESTMENT)
The Hidden Cost of "Just 2.11%": That seemingly small difference of 2.110% annually becomes $42,200 in lost wealth over 20 years. Factor in compound growth, and you're giving up ~$92,164 in potential portfolio value.
💡 Cost Efficiency Winner: IAUI is the clear winner for long-term buy-and-hold investors. Lower fees mean more capital compounds in YOUR account, not the fund manager's.
Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.