DivAgent
LeaderboardPortfoliosPortfolio App
Log InGet Started
DivAgent

The institutional-grade income auditor for the retail investor. Stop chasing yield. Start building wealth.

Academy

  • The Income Illusion
  • Defensive Income
  • Avoid Yield Traps
  • View All Courses

Tools & Resources

  • Risk Spectrum Calculator
  • NAV Erosion Check
  • Dividend Glossary
  • Strategy Articles
  • Article Categories
  • Ticker Database Index
  • Comparison Directory

Portfolio App

  • Track Dividends
  • Import Holdings
  • View Dashboard
Free Tier Available

Company

  • Manifesto
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Join 10,000+ Dividend Investors

Weekly insights on sustainable income strategies. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Important Legal Disclaimer

DivAgent is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst. The content on divagent.ai and app.divagent.ai, including ticker audits, risk tiers, dividend forecasts, and "Monthly Expense Kill Lists," is provided for informational and educational purposes only.

Nothing on this platform constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Investing involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance, including dividend history, is no guarantee of future results.

Data Accuracy & AI Usage: Dividend data is sourced from third-party providers (including Yahoo Finance). Additionally, portions of the content on this site, including articles, summaries, and analysis, may be generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). While we strive for accuracy, DivAgent does not guarantee the timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any data or AI-generated content. Predictive forecasts are based on mathematical heuristics and should not be relied upon for financial planning.

Limitation of Liability: DivAgent shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content, whether human-written or AI-generated, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

By using this site, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Consult with a qualified financial professional before making any financial commitments.

© 2026 DivAgent. All rights reserved.

DivAgent is an informational platform, not a registered investment advisor. Nothing here is financial advice.

LIVEComparison Engine
Last Updated: April 4, 2026

RDVYvsSCHD

Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.

Data Live

What This Page Shows

  • Yield leader: SCHD (2.64% spread)
  • Safer risk tier: RDVY
  • 1Y total return spread: 6.64%
  • Fees, NAV stability, and payout quality side-by-side
  1. Home
  2. Directory
  3. R
  4. RDVY vs SCHD

At a Glance

HEAD-TO-HEAD
RDVY
First
VS
SCHD
Schwab
1.09%
Annual Yield
3.73%
Tier 2
Risk Tier
Tier 2
—
1Y Total Return
6.64%
—
1Y NAV Stability
2.91%
—
Expense Ratio
0.06%
—
Max Drawdown (1Y)
-17.19%
Quick Verdict: SCHD wins on1key metrics.

DivAgent Risk Spectrum

Proprietary Model
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane
RDVY
SCHD
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane

What this means: Both RDVY and SCHD fall intoTier 2: Yield Plus. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.

Deep Dive Analysis

MetricRDVYSCHD
Total Return (1Y)0.00%6.64%
NAV Change (1Y)0.00%2.91%
Max Drawdown0.00%-17.19%
Beta-0.88

* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.

The DivAgent Analyst Take

The comparison between RDVY and SCHD surfaces a fundamental question in dividend investing: do you optimize for income yield today, or for income growth tomorrow? RDVY answers with a resounding 'tomorrow'—its 1.13% yield is a feature, not a bug, reflecting holdings with high dividend growth velocity and low payout ratios. SCHD answers with 'both'—3.56% today, with consistent growth over time.

Key Differences Between RDVY and SCHD

Screening Philosophy

RDVY's First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers methodology screens for stocks that have raised dividends in each of the past 5 years with specific thresholds for payout ratio, trailing dividend growth, and cash balance-to-debt ratios. This identifies companies with dividend momentum and balance sheet capacity to sustain growth. SCHD's methodology combines cash flow to debt, return on equity, trailing dividend yield, and 5-year dividend growth rate—a multi-factor quality composite that captures both income level and quality simultaneously.

Income Timeline

RDVY investors accept low current yield in exchange for potentially superior yield on cost in 10-15 years if the dividend growth thesis plays out. This is a legitimate strategy for long-term wealth builders. SCHD investors receive competitive current income (3.56%) while still participating in dividend growth—a less aggressive but more immediately rewarding balance. Neither approach is wrong; the choice depends on your timeline and income needs.

Portfolio Turnover and Tax Efficiency

RDVY's momentum-based screens create higher portfolio turnover as companies graduate out of the 'rising dividend' category or lose momentum. This higher turnover can create more tax events in taxable accounts. SCHD's screens are more stable—quality companies with established dividend histories don't rotate out as frequently—making it more tax-efficient for taxable investors with long time horizons.

Which Should You Buy?

Choose RDVY if:

  • You're 20-30 years from needing maximum income and prioritize future yield growth
  • You want exposure to companies early in their dividend growth lifecycle
  • You already hold SCHD or similar core income ETF and want a growth complement
  • Low current yield is acceptable given long compounding horizon

Choose SCHD if:

  • You need current income (3.56% vs 1.13% is a significant gap)
  • You want a single high-quality dividend ETF as your core holding
  • Tax efficiency in a taxable account is important—SCHD's lower turnover helps
  • You value a well-tested multi-factor quality methodology over pure momentum

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles

strategy
NAV Erosion vs Return of Capital: What High-Yield Investors Get Wrong
Learn the critical difference between true NAV erosion and return of capital distributions.
strategy
Understanding Liquidity Risk: Why AUM Matters More Than Yield
A practical guide to evaluating liquidity risk in dividend ETFs. Learn how low AUM, thin bid-ask spreads, and fund closures silently erode returns.
strategy
The Crash Test: How the Cornerstone Portfolio Survived 2022
A data-driven backtest of the Cornerstone Strategy vs. the S&P 500 during the inflation bear market.
View all articles →

See How RDVY or SCHD Fits Your Portfolio

Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.

Explore Related Comparisons

Compare SCHD vs...

ABNDX
AMEFX
AMRFX
BIL