All-Weather 130 vs All-Weather 692

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2026.

Judge on

Window

All-Weather 130

High riskHigh reward

18.4%

yield · $153/mo per $10k

WinnerAll-Weather 692

High riskLow reward

2.7%

yield · $23/mo per $10k

All-Weather 692 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 130All-Weather 692Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return0–2

7.8%

Total Ret.

16.2%

22.7%

CAGR

50.8%

Income3–0

18.4%

Yield

2.7%

$153

Income

$23

0.61

Steadiness

1.47

Principal / NAVeven

0.8%

NAV

49.0%

-5.9%

Max DD

-12.2%

Risk4–0

5.8

Risk-Adj.

5.0

3.74

Sortino

2.30

10.7%

Volatility

42.2%

3.5

Safety

3.9

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

All-Weather 130 only

KQQQ 11%QDVO 10%TSMY 10%IWMI 10%VRP 10%QQQI 10%TSLY 10%IAUI 10%FPE 8%AMLP 7%BIL 5%

Shared

No shared holdings

All-Weather 692 only

CSHI 10%TSLL 9%XMAG 9%FDL 9%SCHH 8%VNQ 8%ORCX 8%CONL 8%MAGX 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%IRE 8%

The risk-first read

All-Weather 130 wins on both fronts: more monthly income ($153 vs $23 per $10k) and a better risk-adjusted return — without taking on more tier risk. A clean pick.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2026 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.