All-Weather 130 vs Risk Seeker 696

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jun 2025.

Judge on

Window

All-Weather 130

High riskHigh reward

18.3%

yield · $153/mo per $10k

WinnerRisk Seeker 696

Medium riskHigh reward

16.6%

yield · $138/mo per $10k

Risk Seeker 696 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 130Risk Seeker 696Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return0–2

31.1%

Total Ret.

34.1%

31.1%

CAGR

34.1%

Income3–0

18.3%

Yield

16.6%

$153

Income

$138

0.68

Steadiness

1.86

Principal / NAVeven

6.7%

NAV

10.5%

-5.9%

Max DD

-8.7%

Riskeven

6.1

Risk-Adj.

8.8

5.94

Sortino

4.89

9.4%

Volatility

11.5%

3.5

Safety

2.6

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

All-Weather 130 only

KQQQ 11%QDVO 10%TSMY 10%IWMI 10%VRP 10%QQQI 10%TSLY 10%IAUI 10%FPE 8%AMLP 7%BIL 5%

Shared

No shared holdings

Risk Seeker 696 only

XPAY 20%ANCFX 20%CAIBX 20%GOOY 20%AMECX 20%

The risk-first read

Risk Seeker 696 wins. All-Weather 130 dangles a bigger 18.3% headline yield, but after NAV erosion its total return (31.1%) trails Risk Seeker 696's 34.1% — and at a higher risk tier (3.5 vs 2.6). The classic yield trap.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jun 2025 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.