Battle Arena

All-Weather 130 vs Safe High Income 755

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Oct 2025.

Judge on
Window
All-Weather 130
High riskHigh reward

18.4%

yield · $153/mo per $10k

WinnerSafe High Income 755
Low riskLow reward

4.2%

yield · $35/mo per $10k

Safe High Income 755 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 130Safe High Income 755Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights
Total Return0–2
16.7%
Total Ret.
36.0%
26.6%
CAGR
60.1%
Income3–0
18.4%
Yield
4.2%
$153
Income
$35
0.71
Steadiness
0.83
Principal / NAVeven
2.6%
NAV
31.9%
-5.9%
Max DD
-8.2%
Riskeven
5.8
Risk-Adj.
7.9
4.67
Sortino
4.42
10.3%
Volatility
21.8%
3.5
Safety
2.0

Holdings overlap

11% overlap

All-Weather 130 only

KQQQ 11%QDVO 10%TSMY 10%IWMI 10%VRP 10%QQQI 10%TSLY 10%IAUI 10%FPE 8%

Shared

AMLP 7%BIL 5%

Safe High Income 755 only

SGOV 15%NBIL 11%ING 8%DEO 8%NVS 8%VALE 8%UBS 8%MPW 8%PFE 8%

The risk-first read

Safe High Income 755 wins. All-Weather 130 dangles a bigger 18.4% headline yield, but after NAV erosion its total return (16.7%) trails Safe High Income 755's 36.0% — and at a higher risk tier (3.5 vs 2.0). The classic yield trap.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week
The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Oct 2025 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.