All-Weather 130 vs Test Aaron

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jun 2025.

Judge on

Window

WinnerAll-Weather 130

High riskHigh reward

18.3%

yield · $153/mo per $10k

Test Aaron

High riskMedium reward

7.7%

yield · $64/mo per $10k

All-Weather 130 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 130Test AaronDistributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return2–0

31.1%

Total Ret.

16.3%

31.1%

CAGR

16.3%

Income2–1

18.3%

Yield

7.7%

$153

Income

$64

0.68

Steadiness

0.38

Principal / NAV0–2

6.7%

NAV

7.8%

-5.9%

Max DD

-5.3%

Risk3–1

6.1

Risk-Adj.

4.0

5.94

Sortino

3.58

9.4%

Volatility

7.3%

3.5

Safety

3.6

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

All-Weather 130 only

KQQQ 11%QDVO 10%TSMY 10%IWMI 10%VRP 10%QQQI 10%TSLY 10%IAUI 10%FPE 8%AMLP 7%BIL 5%

Shared

No shared holdings

Test Aaron only

JEPI 40%QQQH 40%SCHD 20%

The risk-first read

All-Weather 130 wins on both fronts: more monthly income ($153 vs $64 per $10k) and a better risk-adjusted return — without taking on more tier risk. A clean pick.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jun 2025 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.