Battle Arena

All-Weather 130 vs The Middle Path 859

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jun 2025.

Judge on
Window
WinnerAll-Weather 130
High riskHigh reward

18.4%

yield · $153/mo per $10k

The Middle Path 859
High riskHigh reward

15.1%

yield · $126/mo per $10k

All-Weather 130 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 130The Middle Path 859Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights
Total Return2–0
31.1%
Total Ret.
27.2%
31.1%
CAGR
27.2%
Income3–0
18.4%
Yield
15.1%
$153
Income
$126
0.68
Steadiness
0.80
Principal / NAVeven
6.7%
NAV
10.1%
-5.9%
Max DD
-7.6%
Risk3–0
5.8
Risk-Adj.
5.7
5.94
Sortino
3.89
9.4%
Volatility
11.8%
3.5
Safety
3.5

Holdings overlap

40% overlap

All-Weather 130 only

KQQQ 11%QDVO 10%TSMY 10%IWMI 10%VRP 10%IAUI 10%

Shared

QQQI 10%TSLY 10%FPE 8%AMLP 7%BIL 5%

The Middle Path 859 only

GPIQ 10%BIZD 10%NVDL 10%SRLN 10%SPYI 10%JEPQ 10%

The risk-first read

All-Weather 130 wins on both fronts: more monthly income ($153 vs $126 per $10k) and a better risk-adjusted return — without taking on more tier risk. A clean pick.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week
The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jun 2025 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.