Battle Arena

All-Weather 692 vs Quality Yield 813

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2026.

Judge on
Window
WinnerAll-Weather 692
High riskLow reward

2.7%

yield · $23/mo per $10k

Quality Yield 813
Medium riskLow reward

4.8%

yield · $40/mo per $10k

All-Weather 692 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 692Quality Yield 813Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights
Total Return2–0
16.2%
Total Ret.
2.3%
50.8%
CAGR
6.4%
Income0–3
2.7%
Yield
4.8%
$23
Income
$40
1.47
Steadiness
0.95
Principal / NAV2–0
49.0%
NAV
0.2%
-12.2%
Max DD
-12.5%
Risk1–3
5.0
Risk-Adj.
10.8
2.30
Sortino
0.59
42.2%
Volatility
18.8%
3.9
Safety
2.3

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

All-Weather 692 only

CSHI 10%TSLL 9%XMAG 9%FDL 9%SCHH 8%VNQ 8%ORCX 8%CONL 8%MAGX 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%IRE 8%

Shared

No shared holdings

Quality Yield 813 only

ING 16%DEO 15%NVS 15%VALE 15%UBS 15%FPE 12%AMLP 11%

The risk-first read

Quality Yield 813 wins the risk-adjusted call: 2.3% total return at a meaningfully lower risk tier (2.3 vs 3.9). You're paid more per unit of risk — and All-Weather 692's extra tier exposure isn't buying enough return to justify it.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week
The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2026 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.