All-Weather 692 vs Retirement Fortress

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2026.

Judge on

Window

WinnerAll-Weather 692

High riskLow reward

2.7%

yield · $23/mo per $10k

Retirement Fortress

Low riskLow reward

2.4%

yield · $20/mo per $10k

All-Weather 692 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 692Retirement FortressDistributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return2–0

16.2%

Total Ret.

9.0%

50.8%

CAGR

26.8%

Income2–1

2.7%

Yield

2.4%

$23

Income

$20

1.47

Steadiness

0.07

Principal / NAVeven

49.0%

NAV

8.4%

-12.2%

Max DD

-5.6%

Risk0–4

5.0

Risk-Adj.

10.8

2.30

Sortino

4.25

42.2%

Volatility

10.9%

3.9

Safety

1.9

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

All-Weather 692 only

CSHI 10%TSLL 9%XMAG 9%FDL 9%SCHH 8%VNQ 8%ORCX 8%CONL 8%MAGX 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%IRE 8%

Shared

No shared holdings

Retirement Fortress only

SCHD 30%VYM 25%DGRO 20%VIG 15%DVY 10%

The risk-first read

Retirement Fortress wins the risk-adjusted call: 9.0% total return at a meaningfully lower risk tier (1.9 vs 3.9). You're paid more per unit of risk — and All-Weather 692's extra tier exposure isn't buying enough return to justify it.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2026 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.