Battle Arena

All-Weather 692 vs The Middle Path 859

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2026.

Judge on
Window
WinnerAll-Weather 692
High riskLow reward

2.7%

yield · $23/mo per $10k

The Middle Path 859
High riskHigh reward

15.1%

yield · $126/mo per $10k

All-Weather 692 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

All-Weather 692The Middle Path 859Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights
Total Return2–0
16.2%
Total Ret.
7.2%
50.8%
CAGR
20.9%
Income0–3
2.7%
Yield
15.1%
$23
Income
$126
1.47
Steadiness
0.89
Principal / NAVeven
49.0%
NAV
2.2%
-12.2%
Max DD
-7.6%
Risk0–4
5.0
Risk-Adj.
5.7
2.30
Sortino
3.04
42.2%
Volatility
13.2%
3.9
Safety
3.5

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

All-Weather 692 only

CSHI 10%TSLL 9%XMAG 9%FDL 9%SCHH 8%VNQ 8%ORCX 8%CONL 8%MAGX 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%IRE 8%

Shared

No shared holdings

The Middle Path 859 only

GPIQ 10%BIZD 10%QQQI 10%NVDL 10%TSLY 10%SRLN 10%SPYI 10%JEPQ 10%AMLP 8%FPE 8%BIL 5%

The risk-first read

The Middle Path 859 wins on both fronts: more monthly income ($126 vs $23 per $10k) and a better risk-adjusted return — without taking on more tier risk. A clean pick.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week
The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2026 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.