Balanced Blend 104 vs Global Conservative

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2023.

Judge on

Window

Balanced Blend 104

Medium riskLow reward

3.8%

yield · $32/mo per $10k

WinnerGlobal Conservative

Low riskLow reward

2.6%

yield · $22/mo per $10k

Global Conservative wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Balanced Blend 104Global ConservativeDistributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return0–2

29.3%

Total Ret.

64.6%

7.9%

CAGR

16.0%

Income2–1

3.8%

Yield

2.6%

$32

Income

$22

0.96

Steadiness

0.45

Principal / NAV0–2

11.3%

NAV

44.2%

-13.1%

Max DD

-9.7%

Risk1–3

5.1

Risk-Adj.

13.9

1.07

Sortino

1.88

11.7%

Volatility

12.2%

2.5

Safety

1.8

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

Balanced Blend 104 only

BKLN 13%CGCP 13%DHS 13%DIV 13%BBRE 13%REZ 13%RWR 13%SCHH 13%

Shared

No shared holdings

Global Conservative only

SCHD 30%VYM 25%VYMI 25%IDV 20%

The risk-first read

Global Conservative wins. Balanced Blend 104 dangles a bigger 3.8% headline yield, but after NAV erosion its total return (29.3%) trails Global Conservative's 64.6% — and at a higher risk tier (2.5 vs 1.8). The classic yield trap.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2023 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.