Compounding Machine 831 vs Global Conservative

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Aug 2024.

Judge on

Window

Compounding Machine 831

Medium riskLow reward

5.3%

yield · $44/mo per $10k

WinnerGlobal Conservative

Low riskLow reward

2.6%

yield · $22/mo per $10k

Global Conservative wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Compounding Machine 831Global ConservativeDistributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return0–2

21.1%

Total Ret.

40.1%

11.3%

CAGR

20.8%

Income2–1

5.3%

Yield

2.6%

$44

Income

$22

0.72

Steadiness

0.51

Principal / NAVeven

8.3%

NAV

31.1%

-5.4%

Max DD

-9.0%

Riskeven

4.9

Risk-Adj.

14.2

2.30

Sortino

2.26

6.8%

Volatility

12.2%

2.1

Safety

1.8

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

Compounding Machine 831 only

AMRFX 10%AMLP 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%DHS 8%DIV 8%DWX 8%QDVO 8%SDIV 8%VRP 8%BIL 8%SGOV 8%

Shared

No shared holdings

Global Conservative only

SCHD 30%VYM 25%VYMI 25%IDV 20%

The risk-first read

Global Conservative wins. Compounding Machine 831 dangles a bigger 5.3% headline yield, but after NAV erosion its total return (21.1%) trails Global Conservative's 40.1% — and at a higher risk tier (2.1 vs 1.8). The classic yield trap.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Aug 2024 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.