Compounding Machine 831 vs Quality Yield 688

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Oct 2025.

Judge on

Window

Compounding Machine 831

Medium riskLow reward

5.3%

yield · $44/mo per $10k

WinnerQuality Yield 688

Medium riskLow reward

4.1%

yield · $34/mo per $10k

Quality Yield 688 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Compounding Machine 831Quality Yield 688Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return0–2

10.0%

Total Ret.

41.8%

15.7%

CAGR

70.5%

Income3–0

5.3%

Yield

4.1%

$44

Income

$34

0.85

Steadiness

1.17

Principal / NAVeven

5.4%

NAV

37.1%

-3.4%

Max DD

-8.4%

Riskeven

4.9

Risk-Adj.

7.8

5.29

Sortino

5.84

5.3%

Volatility

20.6%

2.1

Safety

2.2

Holdings overlap

15% overlap

Compounding Machine 831 only

AMRFX 10%AMLP 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%DHS 8%DIV 8%DWX 8%QDVO 8%SDIV 8%VRP 8%

Shared

BIL 8%SGOV 8%

Quality Yield 688 only

ING 12%PFE 12%OHI 12%NWG 12%DOW 12%NBIL 11%

The risk-first read

Quality Yield 688 wins. Compounding Machine 831 dangles a bigger 5.3% headline yield, but after NAV erosion its total return (10.0%) trails Quality Yield 688's 41.8% — and at a higher risk tier (2.1 vs 2.2). The classic yield trap.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Oct 2025 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.