Compounding Machine 831 vs Risk Seeker 696

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Oct 2024.

Judge on

Window

Compounding Machine 831

Medium riskLow reward

5.3%

yield · $44/mo per $10k

WinnerRisk Seeker 696

Medium riskHigh reward

16.5%

yield · $138/mo per $10k

Risk Seeker 696 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Compounding Machine 831Risk Seeker 696Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return0–2

20.3%

Total Ret.

42.7%

12.3%

CAGR

25.0%

Income1–2

5.3%

Yield

16.5%

$44

Income

$138

0.73

Steadiness

1.70

Principal / NAV2–0

8.6%

NAV

6.9%

-5.4%

Max DD

-13.2%

Riskeven

4.9

Risk-Adj.

8.7

2.42

Sortino

2.78

7.0%

Volatility

13.6%

2.1

Safety

2.6

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

Compounding Machine 831 only

AMRFX 10%AMLP 8%BKLN 8%CGCP 8%DHS 8%DIV 8%DWX 8%QDVO 8%SDIV 8%VRP 8%BIL 8%SGOV 8%

Shared

No shared holdings

Risk Seeker 696 only

XPAY 20%ANCFX 20%CAIBX 20%GOOY 20%AMECX 20%

The risk-first read

Risk Seeker 696 takes it on risk-adjusted return (8.7 vs 4.9), winning 6 of the 11 head-to-head stats. Compounding Machine 831's one edge is a lower 2.1 risk tier — worth it only if that's specifically what you're after.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Oct 2024 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.