Dividend Growth Foundation vs Sharpe Maximizer

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Feb 2023.

Judge on

Window

WinnerDividend Growth Foundation

Low riskLow reward

2.0%

yield · $16/mo per $10k

Sharpe Maximizer

Low riskLow reward

3.8%

yield · $31/mo per $10k

Dividend Growth Foundation wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Dividend Growth FoundationSharpe MaximizerDistributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return2–0

57.0%

Total Ret.

39.5%

14.5%

CAGR

10.5%

Income1–2

2.0%

Yield

3.8%

$16

Income

$31

0.49

Steadiness

0.54

Principal / NAVeven

45.1%

NAV

22.8%

-13.0%

Max DD

-11.9%

Risk1–3

9.4

Risk-Adj.

11.3

1.75

Sortino

1.24

12.2%

Volatility

12.2%

2.0

Safety

1.9

Holdings overlap

75% overlap

Dividend Growth Foundation only

RDVY 10%

Shared

VIG 35%DGRO 30%SCHD 25%

Sharpe Maximizer only

HDV 15%

The risk-first read

Sharpe Maximizer takes it on risk-adjusted return (11.3 vs 9.4), winning 6 of the 11 head-to-head stats. Dividend Growth Foundation's one edge is a lower 2.0 risk tier — worth it only if that's specifically what you're after.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Feb 2023 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.