Battle Arena

Global Conservative vs The Middle Path 859

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2024.

Judge on
Window
Global Conservative
Low riskLow reward

2.6%

yield · $22/mo per $10k

WinnerThe Middle Path 859
High riskHigh reward

15.1%

yield · $126/mo per $10k

The Middle Path 859 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Global ConservativeThe Middle Path 859Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights
Total Return0–2
56.9%
Total Ret.
74.9%
21.2%
CAGR
26.9%
Income1–2
2.6%
Yield
15.1%
$22
Income
$126
0.48
Steadiness
0.73
Principal / NAV2–0
43.7%
NAV
23.6%
-9.0%
Max DD
-19.4%
Risk4–0
14.2
Risk-Adj.
5.7
2.44
Sortino
2.31
11.8%
Volatility
17.7%
1.8
Safety
3.5

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

Global Conservative only

SCHD 30%VYM 25%VYMI 25%IDV 20%

Shared

No shared holdings

The Middle Path 859 only

GPIQ 10%BIZD 10%QQQI 10%NVDL 10%TSLY 10%SRLN 10%SPYI 10%JEPQ 10%AMLP 8%FPE 8%BIL 5%

The risk-first read

Global Conservative wins the risk-adjusted call: 56.9% total return at a meaningfully lower risk tier (1.8 vs 3.5). You're paid more per unit of risk — and The Middle Path 859's extra tier exposure isn't buying enough return to justify it.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week
The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2024 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.