Quality Yield 688 vs Sharpe Maximizer

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Oct 2025.

Judge on

Window

WinnerQuality Yield 688

Medium riskLow reward

4.1%

yield · $34/mo per $10k

Sharpe Maximizer

Low riskLow reward

3.8%

yield · $31/mo per $10k

Quality Yield 688 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Quality Yield 688Sharpe MaximizerDistributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights

Total Return2–0

41.8%

Total Ret.

8.7%

70.5%

CAGR

13.5%

Income2–1

4.1%

Yield

3.8%

$34

Income

$31

1.17

Steadiness

0.57

Principal / NAVeven

37.1%

NAV

2.2%

-8.4%

Max DD

-7.9%

Risk1–3

7.7

Risk-Adj.

11.3

5.84

Sortino

1.50

20.6%

Volatility

12.4%

2.2

Safety

1.9

Holdings overlap

0% overlap

Quality Yield 688 only

BIL 15%SGOV 15%ING 12%PFE 12%OHI 12%NWG 12%DOW 12%NBIL 11%

Shared

No shared holdings

Sharpe Maximizer only

SCHD 35%VIG 30%DGRO 20%HDV 15%

The risk-first read

Sharpe Maximizer takes it on risk-adjusted return (11.3 vs 7.7), winning 6 of the 11 head-to-head stats. Quality Yield 688's one edge is a higher 4.1% yield — worth it only if that's specifically what you're after.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week

The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Oct 2025 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.