Battle Arena

Quality Yield 813 vs The Middle Path 859

How $10,000 would have grown in each — compared across total return, income, NAV, and risk.

Compared over their common history since Jan 2024.

Judge on
Window
Quality Yield 813
Medium riskLow reward

4.8%

yield · $40/mo per $10k

WinnerThe Middle Path 859
High riskHigh reward

15.1%

yield · $126/mo per $10k

The Middle Path 859 wins on total return (2–0, full common history).

Growth of $10,000 (dividends reinvested)

Quality Yield 813The Middle Path 859Distributions reinvested · hypothetical, fixed weights
Total Return0–2
47.8%
Total Ret.
74.9%
18.1%
CAGR
26.9%
Income0–3
4.8%
Yield
15.1%
$40
Income
$126
1.10
Steadiness
0.73
Principal / NAV2–0
29.1%
NAV
23.6%
-12.5%
Max DD
-19.4%
Risk3–1
10.8
Risk-Adj.
5.7
1.67
Sortino
2.31
15.5%
Volatility
17.7%
2.3
Safety
3.5

Holdings overlap

15% overlap

Quality Yield 813 only

ING 16%DEO 15%NVS 15%VALE 15%UBS 15%

Shared

FPE 12%AMLP 11%

The Middle Path 859 only

GPIQ 10%BIZD 10%QQQI 10%NVDL 10%TSLY 10%SRLN 10%SPYI 10%JEPQ 10%BIL 5%

The risk-first read

Quality Yield 813 wins the risk-adjusted call: 47.8% total return at a meaningfully lower risk tier (2.3 vs 3.5). You're paid more per unit of risk — and The Middle Path 859's extra tier exposure isn't buying enough return to justify it.

Get one battle like this in your inbox every week
The Dividend Brief — free, risk-first, 2-min read.

Run your own matchups

Filter 30 portfolios by risk and reward and let the data crown a champion.

Growth is a hypothetical, fixed-weight backtest with distributions reinvested at ex-date since Jan 2024 — no fees or taxes; past performance doesn't predict future results. How these numbers are computed. Not investment advice.